GENUKI   locationsLocations list

Locations, Map References and Sources

The placename data has been extracted from a number of sources, of varying ages, precision and reliability, and this variability has implications for how the data is displayed. The sources, and the display conventions used for them are:

The division of Cairney between Banffshire and Aberdeenshire ended on 15th May 1891, with the transfer of the Banffshire part of the parish to Keith. It therefore follows that some of the sources generally used in compiling these Gazetteers are inappropriate. Specifically, Ordnance Survey Explorer and Ordnance Survey Landranger were not consulted in compiling this list of placenames. Many of the the places themselves, of course, did continue to exist, and to appear on maps - but as part of the undivided Banffshire parish, and that is where you must look for the later history of the placenames in this area.

Ordnance Survey 1st Edition: The first popular edition of the Ordnance Survey 1" maps were published in the 1860s, and regularly revised therafter. In place of the the reprinted version of the 1896 edition of this map, as published by Caledonian Maps, we have for Cairney (BAN) used original sheets published in 1887, which show the pre-1891 boundaries, and one or two other differences. The 'Source' entry is "OS 1887" plus the sheet number. The first edition 1" maps maps pre-date the invention of the National Grid Reference system, so places are listed with Latitude and Longitude, and the number of the map sheet. They are also given a calculated grid reference "AB123456" which will let you see on a modern map where these locations would have been. The 1896 maps, as published by Caledonian Maps, will show most of the same placenames as the 1887 sheets, but do not show the division between the Banffshire and Moray parts of Keithpre-1891 county boundary between Aberdeenshire and Banffshire.

Variant Names: Many of the placename variants found consist of no more than alternative spellings: "Kirkton" or "Kirktown". Others are less obvious: is "Nether Towie" the same as "Lower Towie"? Others again are definitely problematic: "Sheils" (in the parish of Botriphnie) is almost certainly the same place as "Sheals"; but what about "Shells"? Or even "Skull", which is also in the same area? In drawing up the list of placenames, we have deliberately avoided making judgements in such cases, and have preferred to present the evidence so that individual researchers can judge for themselves.

Repeated Names: There are sometimes multiple instances of one name for different locations within a single parish. Many parishes, for example, had several places called "Smithy". We have numbered these as "Smithy (1)", "Smithy (2)" etc. We have used the same notation where there are places with the same name on either side of a parish boundary (eg "Greens of Blairock (Deskford)" to distinguish it from "Greens of Blairock (Rathven)", which is less than a mile distant).

Changed Names: In a small number of cases, the name attached to a particular place can be shown to have changed completely, or the one place can be shown to have carrried widely different names. Cases like this are cross-referred, by having the alternative name added in square brackets (eg "Warylip [=Fitmacan]"). We have used the same notation to flag up what we think are misreadings (eg "Maltrie (?) [=Inaltrie]").

Related Names: As an aid to identifying places whose name may have varied subtly over time, we have, as far as possible, grouped names under a "headword": instead of appearing scattered throughout the list, "Nether Whitehill", "Upper Whitehill", "Whitehill Mill", and "Lower Whitehill Croft" are all grouped together under "Whitehill". But occasionally, particularly with placenames found only in the Census, it is hard to decide which is the "headword". To take an example from Botriphnie: does "Midtown of Glack" belong with "Midtown" or with "Glack" (both of which are recorded)? It is not always possible to resolve such questions, and such places will appear twice, once under each "headword".

Return to top of page


If you have found any errors or omissions, or have any suggestions about this page, please use the feedback form

[Last updated: 24 Jan 2007 - Gavin Bell]

Valid HTML 4.0!